Science and Development Network
News, views and information about science, technology and the developing world
National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, India
6 July 2005 | EN
I entirely agree with Subbiah Arunachalam's comment on the need to publicly archive research done by Indian scientists with Indian funding (See Developing nations should back open access to science).
These studies pass through rigorous processes to obtain funds. Often, these studies are planned according to the needs of our country and are not driven by funders in other countries
It is unfortunate that we are unable to recognise the value of our own researchers, and wait instead for external agencies to do so. Thus, the importance of international journals grows, whereas that of our own national journals does not.
There is a need to re-examine the way we evaluate science and also develop our own regulations to ensure that they conform to international standards. No doubt international standards are important, but recognising our own potential through our own measures is significant for national development.
It is important to acknowledge the potential of Indian scientists. We have to establish ways to identify, recognise and contribute to their development through our system. Indian journals are only a means for such development of Indian scientists.
Is India being too hasty in drafting a new law to increase university patenting?
An epidemic of kidney disease among farming communities is puzzling Sri Lankan researchers

- Indian National Science Academy
- Indian Academy of Sciences
- National Academy of Agricultural Sciences
- Vigyan Prasar
Add your comment
All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.
You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.